Here’s a comprehensive guide for preparing a project on mental disorders and treatment modalities based on the provided rubric:
### 1. Objectives
**Goal and Objectives:**
– **Unsatisfactory (0 to 1 points):** The project lacks a clear goal and objectives.
– **Needs Improvement (2 to 4 points):** The goal and objectives are present but may not be well-aligned or meet SMART criteria.
– **Satisfactory (5 to 8 points):** The goal is stated, and objectives mostly align and meet SMART criteria.
– **Excellent (9 to 12 points):** Clearly states the overarching goal. Objectives are SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, timely) and align with the goal.
**Tips for Excellence:**
– Define a clear overarching goal for the project.
– Ensure each objective is Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound.
– Verify that objectives align with the main goal.
### 2. Introduction/Background
**Introduction:**
– **Unsatisfactory (0 to 3 points):** No introduction or fails to refer to relevant research. Content is inaccurate or citations are poorly used.
– **Needs Improvement (4 to 8 points):** Ineffective introduction, lacking depth and accuracy. Citations are either irrelevant or misused.
– **Satisfactory (9 to 12 points):** Provides a basic introduction and synthesizes prior research. Content is mostly accurate and cited appropriately.
– **Excellent (13 to 16 points):** Comprehensive introduction. Thorough synthesis of prior research with in-depth, accurate, and relevant content. Proper and timely citations.
**Tips for Excellence:**
– Offer a detailed overview of the mental disorder, including definitions and relevance.
– Include a review of prior research to provide context and support your discussion.
– Ensure citations are current and relevant to the topic.
### 3. Teaching Content
**Content Organization and Creativity:**
– **Unsatisfactory (0 to 3 points):** Disorganized with no creativity. Minimal coverage of mental disorders and treatments. No evaluation of learning.
– **Needs Improvement (4 to 8 points):** Disorganized or unclear layout. Limited creativity. Inadequate coverage of topics and evaluation questions.
– **Satisfactory (9 to 24 points):** Generally clear presentation with logical organization. Some creativity. Covers topics adequately with post-test questions that promote critical thinking.
– **Excellent (25 to 40 points):** Clear, well-organized, and reader-friendly presentation. Creative and visually appealing. Comprehensive coverage of the mental disorder and treatment strategies. Engaging with well-crafted post-test questions.
**Tips for Excellence:**
– Ensure a logical flow and organization in the presentation.
– Integrate supportive images and maintain a consistent style.
– Cover both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments thoroughly.
– Include post-test questions that challenge critical thinking and include strong distractors.
### 4. Presentation Style
**Engagement and Confidence:**
– **Unsatisfactory (0 to 3 points):** No audience engagement or confidence. Limited interaction and heavy reliance on notes.
– **Needs Improvement (4 to 8 points):** Minimal engagement and interaction. Some lack of confidence and creativity.
– **Satisfactory (9 to 16 points):** Some engagement with the audience and confidence. Interaction opportunities are present but may be limited.
– **Excellent (17 to 24 points):** Frequent audience interaction, confident delivery, minimal reliance on notes, and high creativity.
**Tips for Excellence:**
– Engage the audience with questions, comments, or interactive activities.
– Display confidence and knowledge without relying heavily on notes.
– Incorporate creative elements to enhance the presentation.
### 5. Grammar and APA Format
**Writing and Citation:**
– **Unsatisfactory (0 to 0.75 points):** Poor readability, numerous errors in writing mechanics and APA format. No references.
– **Needs Improvement (1 to 1.75 points):** Inconsistent clarity, frequent writing and APA format errors. Few or no references.
– **Satisfactory (2 to 5 points):** Generally clear ideas with minor errors. One reference present.
– **Excellent (5.5 to 8 points):** Well-organized, clear, and superior readability. Proper APA format and multiple references.
**Tips for Excellence:**
– Proofread for grammar and clarity.
– Ensure all citations and references follow APA format accurately.
– Include a range of relevant references to support your content.
By adhering to these guidelines and focusing on each criterion, you can create a well-organized and effective presentation or project on mental disorders and treatment modalities.
5/7/2021 20215C – NUR685-50 – Advanced Practice Psychiatric Mental …
1/3
Rubric – Self and Peer Review on Mental Disorders and Treatment Modalities
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Satisfactory Excellent
Objectives 0 to 1 points
The goal and objectives were not stated.
2 to 4 points
The goal and objectives lack alignment with each other. The objectives are lacking in SMART criteria.
5 to 8 points
States the goal for the project. Objectives mostly align and are mostly SMART (speci�c, measurable, achievable, realistic, timely).
9 to 12 points
Clearly states the overarching goal of the project. Objectives are SMART (speci�c, measurable, achievable, realistic, timely) and align with the goal
Introduction/Background 0 to 3 points
No Introduction was present. Fails to refer to the research in the area of the mental disorder. Content is inaccurate. Citations are inappropriately used or not used.
4 to 8 points
Ine�ective introduction of the mental disorder. Lacks evidence of research on the area. Lacks depth and accuracy. Citations are listed but not relevant or appropriately used.
9 to 12 points
Introduces the mental disorder. Provides a synthesis of prior research on the topic. Demonstrates mostly accurate knowledge of topic. Content is relevant and appropriately cited.
13 to 16 points
Presents a comprehensive introduction to the mental disorder. Provides a synthesis of prior research on the topic. Demonstrates in- depth knowledge of topic. Content is accurate, relevant, timely, and appropriately cited.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
5/7/2021 20215C – NUR685-50 – Advanced Practice Psychiatric Mental …
2/3
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Satisfactory Excellent
Teaching Content 0 to 3 points
No line of organization. No creativity present. Barely covered the mental disorder, and treatments including both pharmacological and non- pharmacological strategies. Did not evaluate learning by providing post- test questions.
4 to 8 points
Presentation di�cult to follow. Layout disorganized, unclear, too much or too little information to get points across, images are distracting. Little creativity present. Did not cover the mental disorder or treatment strategies adequately. Evaluated learning by including three post test questions, however, questions did not include critical thinking or strong dis tractors in the responses.
9 to 24 points
Presentation generally clear, page layout logical and fairly organized. Visually attractive but not consistent in style. Integrates images that are supportive. Presenter was prepared, addressed the disorder, and treatment strategies, however there are opportunities for improvement in mastery of content and presentation. Evaluated learning by providing at least 3-4 post test questions that included strong distractors and critical thinking.
25 to 40 points
Presentation is clear, page layout logical, succinct, reader- friendly, and organized. Integrates images that are visually attractive and creative, supportive, and consistent in style. Presenter covered the mental disorder and treatment strategies in a comprehensive manner. Presenter was well spoken and seem to master the topic that was presented.
5/7/2021 20215C – NUR685-50 – Advanced Practice Psychiatric Mental …
3/3
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Satisfactory Excellent
Presentation Style 0 to 3 points
No engagement with the audience. Did not display con�dence. Primarily read o� the notes. Provided limited opportunities for interaction with the audience.
4 to 8 points
Limited engagement with the audience. Provided little or no comments or opportunities for interaction with the audience. Did not appear con�dent. Mostly read o� notes. Little creativity noted.
9 to 16 points
Provided comments or opportunities for interaction with the audience at least 2 times during the presentation. Appeared con�dent, yet read mostly o� notes. Some creativity noted.
17 to 24 points
Provided questions, comments or opportunities for interaction with the audience > than 3 times during the presentation. Appeared con�dent when presenting. Did not read o� notes. Creative throughout the presentation.
Grammar APA format References
0 to 0.75 points
Poor readability. Consistent errors in writing mechanics and APA format. No reference cited.
1 to 1.75 points
Inconsistent clarity of ideas. Consistent errors in writing mechanics and APA format. No reference cited.
2 to 5 points
Usually clear ideas. Minor errors in writing mechanics and APA format. One reference present.
5.5 to 8 points
Well organized. Superior readability throughout. Properly formatted APA in- text citation and reference.
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."
