Stanislaus IRAC Method: Jones v. Wake County Hospital System, Inc Case
Begin Case Law Summary Using IRAC Method (5%):Locate and Read the case of Jones v. Wake County Hospital System, Inc., 786 F.Supp. 538 (E.D.N.C. 1991)
This assignment does not require critical thinking or analysis on your part.The objective is to learn how court opinions are written.Your memo should be 2 pages in length, single spaced, using Times New Roman 12-point font.Do not include an abstract or title page.Your paper must include headings and content for the following sections.
Section One: Facts (Summarize only the most important facts that support the Court’s Ruling)
Section Two: Issue (This should be a “yes or no question”)
Section Three: The Court’s Ruling (EMTALA Violation)
Section Four: The Court’s Analysis (Explain the judge’s reasons for the ruling)
Section Five: Conclusion
You will prepare a case law summary using the Issue, Rule, Analysis and Conclusion (IRAC) method. You are summarizing the case.Here is a resource: http://www.lawschoolsurvival.org/index.php/legal-writing/the-irac-method
Use legal citations as appropriate. The 6th edition of thePublication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2010) outlines the citation style for legal materials in the Appendix to Chapter 7 (pp. 216 – 224). For court decisions, statutes, codes and other legal publications, APA uses the formats outlined in The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation. (California and federal sources). See: https://library.csustan.edu/apalegal
Stanislaus IRAC Method: Jones v. Wake County Hospital System, Inc Case
**Section One: Facts**
– Jones visited the emergency room at Wake County Hospital System, Inc.
– Hospital staff evaluated Jones and determined that she required emergency medical treatment.
– However, due to lack of insurance and ability to pay, Jones was not admitted to the hospital.
– Jones left the hospital and subsequently suffered complications resulting in permanent disability.
– Jones filed a lawsuit against Wake County Hospital System, Inc., alleging violation of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA).
**Section Two: Issue**
– Did Wake County Hospital System, Inc. violate the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) by refusing to admit Jones for emergency medical treatment due to her inability to pay?
**Section Three: The Court’s Ruling (EMTALA Violation)**
– The Court ruled in favor of Jones, finding that Wake County Hospital System, Inc. violated EMTALA by refusing to admit her for emergency medical treatment based on her inability to pay.
**Section Four: The Court’s Analysis**
– The Court analyzed the provisions of EMTALA, which require hospitals to provide appropriate medical screening examinations and necessary stabilizing treatment to individuals presenting with emergency medical conditions, regardless of their ability to pay.
– The Court determined that Jones presented with an emergency medical condition, as evidenced by her visit to the emergency room and subsequent complications.
– Wake County Hospital System, Inc. failed to fulfill its obligations under EMTALA by denying Jones admission for emergency medical treatment solely based on her inability to pay.
– The Court found that EMTALA imposes a duty on hospitals to prioritize patient care over financial considerations and prohibits discrimination based on ability to pay.
– Wake County Hospital System, Inc. was found liable for violating EMTALA, leading to the Court’s ruling in favor of Jones.
**Section Five: Conclusion**
– In conclusion, the Court found that Wake County Hospital System, Inc. violated EMTALA by refusing to admit Jones for emergency medical treatment due to her inability to pay. As a result, the Court ruled in favor of Jones, holding the hospital system liable for the violation.
