In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. The ability to articulate research data and summarize relevant content supports the student’s ability to further develop and synthesize the assignments that constitute the components of the capstone project.
The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.
For this assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the “Literature Evaluation Table,” determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (within the last 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Literature Evaluation Table
Student Name:
Change Topic (2-3 sentences):
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
An Original Human-Crafted Assignment
| Criteria | Article 1 | Article 2 | Article 3 | Article 4 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
|
|
|||
| Article Title and Year Published
|
||||
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
|
||||
| Purposes/Aim of Study | ||||
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
|
||||
| Setting/Sample
|
||||
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments
|
||||
| Analysis
|
||||
| Key Findings
|
||||
| Recommendations
|
||||
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project
|
| Criteria | Article 5 | Article 6 | Article 7 | Article 8 |
| Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and
Permalink or Working Link to Access Article
|
|
|||
| Article Title and Year Published
|
||||
| Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)
|
||||
| Purposes/Aim of Study | ||||
| Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)
|
||||
| Setting/Sample
|
||||
| Methods: Intervention/Instruments
|
||||
| Analysis
|
||||
| Key Findings
|
||||
| Recommendations
|
||||
| Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone
|
PICOT Question
The following is an examination of the PICOT question for my capstone project. The PICOT question examines the population of focus in the project, the intervention for the population, the comparison of the intervention, the expected outcome, and the timelines within which the outcomes will be measured (Lira & Rocha, 2019).
PICOT Question
For patients who are diagnosed with chronic illness, does screening for depression as part of standard care procedures compared to no screening for depression in the standard care procedures, improve treatment efficacy in a period of a year?
P: Patients who are diagnosed with chronic illness
I: screening for depression as part of standard care procedures
C: no screening for depression in the standard care procedures
O: improved treatment efficacy
T: a year
Population
The population of the study is patients who have been diagnosed with chronic health issues. People who have been diagnosed with chronic conditions have an increased risk of developing mental health issues such as depression and anxiety. Therefore, this project focuses on this population to find effective strategies for providing nursing care that does not only cater to their physical health needs but also their mental health.
Intervention
The proposed intervention for this project is screening for depression as a standard care procedure. In all patients with chronic diseases, the nurses will be using depression screening tools to examine the state of the mental health of the patients. The information will then be used to plan care procedures that cater to the mental health of the patients. Screening for depression is an effective method of improving the treatment of patients with different chronic health issues (Forbes & Eyre, 2016). Thus, this project examines whether this intervention will work with all patients with these kinds of diseases.
Comparison
A comparison is necessary to determine whether the absence of the intervention will cause any effect on the patients. The comparison factor is the absence of the use of screening tools to assess whether patients have comorbid depression after diagnosis with chronic health issues. It is expected that the lack of screening tools for depression will reduce the rates at which nurses diagnose depression. Therefore, treatment for depression will not be a part of standard care for chronic illness patients. This problem may reduce treatment efficacy in chronic illness care.
Outcomes
The outcome that will be examined in the patients’ treatment efficacy varies depending on the specific chronic health issue. However, some general outcomes that indicate greater treatment efficacy include improved self-management of the disorder, medication adherence, and healthy coping with the condition (Farley, 2020). This capstone project will examine whether including an assessment for depression improves the patients’ ability to achieve these factors.
Timeline
The timeline for examining the impact of this intervention is a year. This is a relatively long period, but it is necessary given the nature of the study. Chronic health conditions are long term conditions in need of long-term care interventions. Therefore, a long period is needed to determine whether the change in care procedures has had an impact on the efficacy of treatments for the patients.
References
Farley, H. (2020). Promoting self‐efficacy in patients with chronic disease beyond traditional education: A literature review. Nursing Open, 7(1), 30-41.
Forbes, M. P., & Eyre, H. A. (2016). Screening for depression in coronary heart disease: detection of early disease states. In Cardiovascular Diseases and Depression (pp. 519-533). Springer, Cham.
Lira, R. P. C., & Rocha, E. M. (2019). PICOT: Imprescriptible items in a clinical research question. Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia, 82(2), 1-1.
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."
