Health Care Delivery Models and Nursing Practice – Rubric

Current or Emerging Health Care Law or Federal Regulation and E�ect

on Nursing Practice, Role and R 24.75 points

Criteria Description

An outline of emerging health care law or federal regulation and a description of the

effect on nursing practice and the nurse role, and responsibility.

5. Target 24.75 points

A clear and accurate outline of an emerging health care law or federal regulation

and a clear and accurate description of the effect on nursing practice and the nurse

role, and responsibility is present.

4. Acceptable 22.03 points

A detailed outline of an emerging health care law or federal regulation and a

detailed description of the effect on nursing practice and the nurse role, and

responsibility is present.

3. Approaching 19.55 points

An outline of an emerging health care law or federal regulation and a description of

the effect on nursing practice and the nurse role, and responsibility is present.

2. Insufficient 18.56 points

An outline of an emerging health care law or federal regulation and a description of

the effect on nursing practice and the nurse role, and responsibility lacks detail or is

incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

An outline of an emerging health care law or federal regulation and a description of

the effect on nursing practice and the nurse role, and responsibility is omitted or

inaccurate.

Examine changes introduced to reform or restructure the U.S. health care delivery system

Quality Measures Pay for Performance, Patient Outcomes, and E�ect on

Nursing Practice 33 points

Criteria Description

A discussion on how quality measures and pay for performance affect patient

outcomes, and how they affect nursing practice, expectations, and responsibilities of

the nursing role.

5. Target 33 points

A clear and accurate discussion on how quality measures and pay for performance

affect patient outcomes, how they affect nursing practice, expectations, and

responsibilities of the nursing role is presented.

4. Acceptable 29.37 points

A detailed discussion on how quality measures and pay for performance affect

patient outcomes, how they affect nursing practice, expectations, and

responsibilities of the nursing role, is presented.

3. Approaching 26.07 points

A discussion on how quality measures and pay for performance affect patient

outcomes, how they affect nursing practice, expectations, and responsibilities of

the nursing role, is presented.

2. Insufficient 24.75 points

A discussion on how quality measures and pay for performance affect patient

outcomes, how they affect nursing practice, expectations, and responsibilities of

the nursing role lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A discussion on how quality measures and pay for performance affect patient

outcomes, how they affect nursing practice, expectations, and responsibilities of

the nursing role is omitted or inaccurate.

 

Professional Nursing Leadership and Management Roles 33 points

Criteria Description

A discussion of professional nursing leadership and management roles that have

arisen and how they are important in responding to emerging trends and in the

promotion of patient safety and quality care in diverse health care settings.

5. Target 33 points

A clear and accurate discussion of professional nursing leadership and

management roles that have arisen, how they are important in responding to

emerging trends, and in the promotion of patient safety and quality care in diverse

health care settings is present.

4. Acceptable 29.37 points

A detailed discussion of professional nursing leadership and management roles

that have arisen, how they are important in responding to emerging trends, and in

the promotion of patient safety and quality care in diverse health care settings is

present.

3. Approaching 26.07 points

A discussion of professional nursing leadership and management roles that have

arisen, how they are important in responding to emerging trends and in the

promotion of patient safety, and quality care in diverse health care settings is

present.

2. Insufficient 24.75 points

A discussion of professional nursing leadership and management roles that have

arisen, how they are important in responding to emerging trends and in the

promotion of patient safety, and quality care in diverse health care settings lacks

detail or is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

A discussion of professional nursing leadership and management roles that have

arisen, how they are important in responding to emerging trends, and in the

promotion of patient safety and quality care in diverse health care settings is

omitted or inaccurate.

 

Predict Change in Nursing Roles and Nursing Practice 24.75 points

Criteria Description

Predictions for how the practice of nursing and nursing roles will grow or transform

within the next 5 years in response to upcoming trends or predicted issues in health

care.

5. Target 24.75 points

Predictions for how the practice of nursing and nursing roles will grow or transform

within the next 5 years in response to upcoming trends or predicted issues in

health care are thoroughly and insightfully discussed.

4. Acceptable 22.03 points

Predictions for how the practice of nursing and nursing roles will grow or transform

within the next 5 years in response to upcoming trends or predicted issues in

health care are discussed in detail.

3. Approaching 19.55 points

Predictions for how the practice of nursing and nursing roles will grow or transform

within the next 5 years in response to upcoming trends or predicted issues in

health care are discussed.

2. Insufficient 18.56 points

Predictions for how the practice of nursing and nursing roles will grow or transform

within the next 5 years in response to upcoming trends or predicted issues in

health care lack detail or are incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Predictions for how the practice of nursing and nursing roles will grow or transform

within the next 5 years in response to upcoming trends or predicted issues in

health care are omitted or inaccurate.

 

Thesis, Position, or Purpose 11.55 points

Criteria Description

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

5. Target 11.55 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly

directed to a specific audience.

4. Acceptable 10.28 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the

appropriate audience is demonstrated.

3. Approaching 9.12 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally

weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

2. Insufficient 8.66 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little

awareness of the intended audience.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate

 

Development, Structure, and Conclusion 11.55 points

Criteria Description

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves

from development.

5. Target 11.55 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression

of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the

development of the purpose.

4. Acceptable 10.28 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on

each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

3. Approaching 9.12 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are

inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic

and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

2. Insufficient 8.66 points

Writing lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some

organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and

not supported by the overall development of the purpose.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections

between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

 

Evidence 9.9 points

Criteria Description

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers

other perspectives.

5. Target 9.9 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are

clearly considered.

4. Acceptable 8.81 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

3. Approaching 7.82 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or

integration of other perspectives is present.

2. Insufficient 7.43 points

Evidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is

superficial or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies

entirely on the perspective of the writer.

Examine changes introduced to reform or restructure the U.S. health care delivery system

 

Mechanics of Writing 9.9 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence

structure, etc.

5. Target 9.9 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence

structure are used throughout.

4. Acceptable 8.81 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence

structure are used.

3. Approaching 7.82 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally

appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2. Insufficient 7.43 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language

choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language

choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Examine changes introduced to reform or restructure the U.S. health care delivery system

 

Format/Documentation 6.6 points

Criteria Description

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;

documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,

appropriate to assignment and discipline.

5. Target 6.6 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present.

4. Acceptable 5.87 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

3. Approaching 5.21 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious

errors.

2. Insufficient 4.95 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors

in documentation of sources are evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.