create a PowerPoint presentation of your research plan that you have been developing in Units I–III

For this assignment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation of your research plan that you have been developing in Units I–III. You will be amending and updating this PowerPoint presentation in future units.

Your PowerPoint presentation must contain the elements below:

a title and introduction slide,
nine slides of content (refer to the unit lesson for a sample format), and
reference slide(s).
Your presentation should clearly demonstrate your plan to answer your research question.

It should demonstrate your understanding of the different types of research methods and approaches by explaining your rationale in your selections.

It should demonstrate your understanding of data sampling and distributions.

You must use a minimum of two sources, in addition to any literature presented as a part of the plan, to support your presentation. You must utilize the Slide

Notes function in PowerPoint to add speaker notes to each slide that you would use to explain and expand on slide content as if you were actually presenting this plan to the institutional review board.

Alternatively, you may add audio to the slides, but if you do so, you will need to provide a transcript of your audio in a separate document and upload it in Blackboard with the PowerPoint presentation file.

You must use at least two sources to support your presentation. Adhere to APA Style when creating citations and references for this assignment.

create a PowerPoint presentation of your research plan that you have been developing in Units I–III

RCH 5302, Foundation for Research 1
Course Learning Outcomes for Unit IV
Upon completion of this unit, students should be able to:
1. Develop a research strategy and design using appropriate components.
1.1 Explain how research will answer questions and solve problems.
3. Examine qualitative and quantitative research methods.
3.1 Discuss why a research plan will use either qualitative or quantitative research methods.
4. Explore the dynamics of data sampling and distributions.
4.1 Explain how data sampling and distributions will be used in a research plan.
Course/Unit
Learning Outcomes
Learning Activity
1.1
Unit Lesson
Chapter 2, p. 30
Appendix A, p. 405
Article: “Declaring and Diagnosing Research Designs”
Unit IV PowerPoint Presentation
3.1 Unit Lesson
Unit IV PowerPoint Presentation
4.1
Unit Lesson
Chapter 5, pp. 139–145
Chapter 6, pp. 197–203
Chapter 9, pp. 312–314
Appendix A, p. 405
Unit IV PowerPoint Presentation
Required Unit Resources
Chapter 2: Generating and Shaping Ideas: Tradition and Innovation, p. 30
Chapter 5: Measures and Survey Research Tools, pp. 139–145
Chapter 6: Correlational and Qualitative Research, pp. 197–203
Chapter 9: Recruiting Participants, pp. 312–314
Appendix A: Decision Tree for Statistical Analysis, p. 405
In order to access the following resource, click the link below.
Read pp. 838–856 in the article below.
Blair, G., Cooper, J., Coppock, A., & Humphreys, M. (2019). Declaring and diagnosing research designs.
American Political Science Review, 113(3), 838–859. Retrieved from
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridgecore/content/view/3CB0C0BB0810AEF8FF65446B3E2E4926/S0003055419000194a.pdf/
declaring_and_diagnosing_research_designs.pdf
UNIT IV STUDY GUIDE
Research Plan and
Introduction to Data Sampling
RCH 5302, Foundation for Research 2
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE

create a PowerPoint presentation of your research plan that you have been developing in Units I–III
Title
Unit Lesson
Refining the Research Plan for Approval and Action
Upon determining the problem; developing the research question; drafting a tentative plan, including the
selection of a method and design; and reviewing the literature, a researcher is close to actively conducting the
research; however, one significant challenge remains: gaining approval. Reasonably, a research proposal will
gain approval if the plan is feasible, sound, and complete with sufficient details; fits as a follow-on step as
shown in pertinent literature; and fits the needs of the organization (if you are completing requirements for a
degree conferral, that is one of the organization’s needs). A few researchers look forward to briefing their
proposals to leaders; others may dread it. For all researchers, such a presentation of their intended work
publicly is a key event that demonstrates the researchers’ competence and effectiveness and contributes to
their individual reputations as professionals. Being excessively shy or boisterous is not forbidden in research,
though neither characteristic will help encourage reviewers to approve a proposal. First-time disapproval with
recommendations for changes will not doom a research study, though with the inevitable additional work
involved to try again, it is much preferred to prepare a thorough and polished proposal that will get approved
the first time.
Finalizing the Research Plan
The material in Units I–III and here in Unit IV illustrate the progression of building a research study from its
beginning, when a problem or question emerges, to the major milestone of having the plan complete enough
to brief it for approval. A good plan will include all of the commonly used research components or an
explanation of why an exception to an omitted component is an optimal choice. The remaining components of
the research design and data collection and analysis plan are developed, and the previously drafted
components from the research problem/question to the literature review are checked and refined. These
components are then all combined to form the research proposal.
Research proposals are written, developed as slides, or both. Certainly, the researcher follows required
organizational formats or, for the best chance of approval, formats of previously approved studies as a
measure of conforming. As can be seen in previous reading assignments, a highly detailed written research
proposal may be organized as shown below.
 Introduction (problem, purpose, the significance of the study, research question[s], the definition of
terms)
 Review of Literature
 Research Method and Design
As a final and full report on the completed research, the results below would be added.
 Presentation and Analysis of Data (and findings)
 Conclusions and Recommendations (limitations of the study, possible sources of bias, suggestions
for further research)
The researchers may not be writing a full report but, rather, a more abbreviated yet still significant report of
perhaps a few to 20 or more pages. As you have seen in previous reading assignments, the researchers may
combine the introduction of the research with the review of literature in one section.
A research proposal slide presentation may be organized as shown below.
 Slide 1: Problem statement
 Slide 2: Purpose statement
 Slide 3: Significance of the study
 Slide 4: Research question(s)
 Slide 5: Definition of terms
 Slide 6: Selected literature
 Slide 7: Methodology
 Slide 8: How the research will be conducted
RCH 5302, Foundation for Research 3
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
Title
 Slide 9: How data analysis will be conducted
Later, once the research is complete, the following information would be amended and/or added to the full
report.
 Slide 8: How the research was conducted
 Slide 9: How analysis was conducted
Construct additional slides for the areas below.
 Findings and implications
 Recommendations
 Suggestions for further research
 References
We continue our exploration of research by focusing on the research process. The research process is taking
action (research actions) and gaining information—usually by following frequently practiced and commonly
accepted steps. The process and its steps are components assembled with procedures and other features
added. The process is the organization of actions and the acquisition of information in order to verify the
problem and question, review recorded ideas and findings, plan the research, gather and analyze the data,
develop one’s own ideas about the research and findings, and report the findings and conclusions of the
research. Repeated below are the steps of the research process in the order that they are usually conducted.
Simplified, the research process may resemble the example below.
In later units of this course, you will see that the commonly accepted research report or paper format roughly
follows these steps.
Recall that the research methods in the two major categories of research, quantitative and qualitative, are as
shown below (with some variation in certain industries and professions).
RCH 5302, Foundation for Research 4
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
Title
When developing their research strategy and design, researchers estimate the situation of their proposed
study, select one of these methods, and add all needed coordination details to refine their planning. Rarely,
but sometimes, they may choose two methods (e.g., for a two-part study). In business and academia alike,
researchers can expect to brief their plan to an authority figure as a research proposal with the goal of gaining
approval, authorization, funding, or all of these.
Data Sampling
Arguably the most stimulating phase of research is the actual collection (sampling) of data. Many researchers
imagine themselves actively conducting research, and this component of research design is where this
happens. Data sampling is planned and presented as a part of the proposal; such an important component
needs to be organized with no effort or resources wasted. Additionally, the reputation of the study’s academic
rigor and veracity is at stake at the time of data sampling. As with the other components of research, there are
some time-tested conventions on data sampling, which will be explored in the second part of Unit IV.
The idea of running a model (in a quantitative study) or commencing with interviewing (in a qualitative study)
and then collecting the results is a straightforward concept. What follows are a few principles of data
management and interviewing and some effective practices (tips) that match them.
Using a hypothesis model usually entails mathematics, physics, and/or chemistry. These categories account
for most quantitative studies. The researcher is well prepared for these due to their experience in college, but
it is useful to recall the concepts of measurement. As depicted in the textbook, academia recognizes four
main measurement types (Devlin, 2018). Nominal is counting in categories, such as the numbers of yes or no
answers; inherently, these have no order—just totals of each type. Ordinal measurement is sorted into an
order of value, and we all agree that zero is nothing, and value proceeds from “not much above zero” to “a
lot.” However, these data values are not necessarily evenly spaced from one another. If you need the latter
attribute, interval measurement scale is ordinal measurement with equally spaced intervals between data
points. Ratio measurement scale is similar to the interval measurement scale but with a zero point, which the
interval measurement scale does not have to have.
These measurement types each have advantages. Nominal measurement, with its categorical data collecting,
is useful for qualitative studies and can offer open-ended interview questions, such as “What do you like
about your housing situation?” These collected answers (data) can be analyzed by simple frequency of
answer or with a mathematical model, such as a chi-square analysis if the researcher constructed a matrix of
categories. Interval measurement is well suited for continuous data, and with that, exponential probability
distribution models can be used for data analysis.
RCH 5302, Foundation for Research 5
UNIT x STUDY GUIDE
In qualitative studies, there are some practices to keep the data sampling “clean.” Indeed, some of these Title
procedures can be described to demonstrate how your proposed study will avoid most biases. Qualitative
studies usually entail the observer collecting data by using the observer’s own sense of sight, hearing,
understanding of interview responses, and other abilities. This is how research studies regarding natural
animal, plant, and human social behavior are commonly conducted. As noted in pp. 199–201 of the textbook,
an observer may be recording sight or sound, be concealed, or have to decide what to record and for how
long (Devlin, 2018). Additionally, researchers must take care not to have their data collection skewed by
unexpected factors such as the Hawthorne Effect, which is named from the study conducted at the Western
Electric Hawthorne plant. In the 1920s, workers observed performances, and efficiency rose before falling
again. It was concluded that the workers worked harder in response to being observed and provided with
increased attention, and they reduced their productivity when they grew suspicious that the studies were a
prelude to employee downsizing. These initiatives from the sample population can distort the data.
An excerpt of a data collection plan in a quantitative research proposal may resemble the example below.
An excerpt of a data collection plan in a qualitative research proposal may resemble the example below.
With the research plan finalized and the research proposal approved, the researcher is cleared and ready for
the most satisfying stage of the process—actual data sampling. These lessons of the first half of the course
were designed to prepare you, the researcher, to conduct the most active part of research. In Unit V and
subsequent units, we will explore more on data sampling, data analysis, and reaching conclusions on the
findings.
Reference
Devlin, A. S. (2018). The research experience: Planning, conducting, and reporting research. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
The following research question and hypothesis were the focus for this research (cite others’ work or
descriptions to support why you chose this research design). After the population sample was
determined, a survey was used to collect desired data on vehicle preferences of single and partnered
purchasers. The independent variable, vi = vehicle purchasers, was manipulated as planned by
measuring preferences of participants in the sample regardless of gender pairing, formality, or absence
of marriage.
Qualitative research and, specifically, the phenomenological research method proved to be well matched to
the research problem (cite others’ work or descriptions to support why you chose this research design).
The research question was (insert research question). The population under study was focused on shop or
factory foreman of a responsibility range for one major manufacturing process, supervision of four to no
more than 10 employees, or both. The method of sampling will be to contact the owner or senior manager
of each of the following companies to request access. The interview questions consisted of (insert interview
questions). These questions were intended to collect the following data (list): (insert data).

create a PowerPoint presentation of your research plan that you have been developing in Units I–III

Literature Review

A significant amount of research has been done to investigate perceptions and attitudes towards environmental sustainability and human action contributing to environmental protection. Santos and Feygina (2017) examined the ideological divide on the issue of climate change. The authors of this article examined the causes of climate change skepticism. They argue that a variety of social and psychological processes are responsible for the lack of belief in the existence of climate change in a significantly large segment of the population. Some of the proposed explanations include motivated reasoning, social dominance orientation, system justification theory, the cultural cognition thesis, belief in a just world, and the social aversion theory.  Motivated reasoning is defined as an unconscious process of developing preferences and making conclusions to align with one’s goals, beliefs, and desires. This means that people are skeptical about climate change because they do not want to believe it since this concept does not align with what they want. They also assume that human beings’ social dominance has caused many to believe that climate change is not happening. They believe that human beings are dominant over nature; hence, negatively impacting human activities do not impact the environment. There is also a belief in nature’s ability to replenish itself and the world being, affecting people’s belief in climate change. This article contributes to the research by confirming the existence of negative beliefs concerning the changing environment. Despite the evidence out there showing climate change, many people are skeptical of its occurrence.

Conversely, some people believe in environmental protection so much that they have a social identity connected to pro-environmental behavior. Brick, Sherman, & Kim (2017) conducted a survey on 1126 American residents investigating pro-environmental identity, visibility, and slef0-reported behaviors. The study found that pro-environmentalists have developed high visibility behaviors o demonstrate their contribution to environmental sustainability. On the other hand, a different group of people does not believe the pro-environmentalists are making any difference. They see their behavior as a way to gain visibility rather than making an impact.

On the other hand, Wang et al. (2019) performed research investigating the willingness to participate in e-waste recycling. The researchers performed an empirical analysis of 1225 participants across regions in China. They found that several factors influence people’s decision to participate in recycling. One of these factors is economic motivation. A lot of people were willing to participate in e-waste disposal because of the financial gain they get from government incentives designed to encourage recycling. Others participated in e-waste disposal because of subjective norms. In their respective places of origin, it was normal to recycle e-waste; hence, they automatically participated in the process. E-waste recycling was also motivated by the people’s attitude towards the process. Many people participated in recycling because they think positively about the whole process. This research is relevant to the research as it demonstrates the different factors that may motivate people to engage in activities designed for environmental protection. The study shows that people engage in such activities for a variety of reasons, some self-motivated and others motivated by the benefit they have on the environment.

Li et al. (2019) also investigated the factors that influence pro-environmental behavior. The authors studied published literature examining human motivation to protect the environment. They found a variety of psychological and demographic variables that determine the extent to which people are willing to participate in environmentally sustainable behaviors. There were internal and external factors that motivate environmental behaviors. Internally, people were motivated by their desire to make a difference. Externally, people were motivated by the benefits that they gain from engaging in environmentally friendly behaviors. Moser & Kleinhückelkotten (2018) conducted a similar survey examining motivators for pro-environmental protection behaviors. A German survey with 1012 participants was done examining per capita energy use, individual carbon footprints, pro-environmental behavior, and behavioral indicators of differences in environmental impact and intent. The study found that people who have a pro-environment protection identity are more likely to engage in behaviors that protect the environment. However, they usually choose those behaviors that have a small impact on the environment.

In general, research demonstrates differences in perceptions about environmental sustainability and people’s actions towards protecting the environment. Some believe in environmental degradation, while others do not believe in it. Some choose to engage in pro-environment behaviors while others choose not to. However, there is a limitation in research that is linking the two. This study seeks to investigate how people’s attitudes towards the environment link with their behaviors.

create a PowerPoint presentation of your research plan that you have been developing in Units I–III

 

References

Brick, C., Sherman, D. K., & Kim, H. S. (2017). “Green to be seen” and “brown to keep down”: Visibility moderates the effect of identity on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology51, 226-238. https://labs.psych.ucsb.edu/sherman/david/sites/labs.psych.ucsb.edu.sherman.david/files/pubs/brick_sherman_kim_2017_green_to_be_seen_and_brown_to_keep_down.pdf

Li, D., Zhao, L., Ma, S., Shao, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling146, 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024

Moser, S., & Kleinhückelkotten, S. (2018). Good intents, but low impacts: diverging importance of motivational and socioeconomic determinants explaining pro-environmental behavior, energy use, and carbon footprint. Environment and Behavior50(6), 626-656. https://boris.unibe.ch/101420/1/Moser2017_postscript.pdf

Santos, J., & Feygina, I. (2017). Responding to climate change skepticism and the ideological divide. Michigan Journal of Sustainability5(1). https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mjs/12333712.0005.102?view=text;rgn=main

Wang, B., Ren, C., Dong, X., Zhang, B., & Wang, Z. (2019). Determinants shaping willingness towards on-line recycling behaviour: An empirical study of household e-waste recycling in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling143, 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.005

 

"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."

Order Solution Now