BHA 4020 Interdisciplinary Presentation of Evidence Based Recommendations PPT

Create and deliver a slide presentation (8-12 slides; 3-5 minutes maximum presentation) on the analysis of a selected health care problem

Create and deliver a slide presentation (8-12 slides; 3-5 minutes maximum presentation) on the analysis of a selected health care problem that includes evidence-based recommendations. Your submission needs to include a narrated webcam recording, using your PowerPoint slides and speaker notes, which serve as a transcript.

Health care leaders scan for emerging and existing issues, prioritize problems, collect and analyze data, propose evidence-based solutions, and engage diverse teams in the process. Once a problem has been sufficiently analyzed, the health care leader must identify stakeholders who will participate in the final decision making for a proposed evidence-based solution.

Most importantly, the health care leader must craft a message that is aligned with organizational mission and strategy, based upon sound analysis and data, and includes of a wide variety of diverse stakeholders. The message needs to be communicated in a clear, concise, culturally competent, balanced, and professional manner.

BHA 4020 Interdisciplinary Presentation of Evidence Based Recommendations PPT

In this assessment, you will have an opportunity to practice a wide variety of executive level skills by conducting a PowerPoint presentation on the selected health care problem. You will demonstrate a flow of logic and analysis by following a slide presentation outline template.  In the presentation you will carry forward the work already completed in Assessment 3.  Specifically you will cover the following in your presentation:

• • State the problem.
  • Identify clearly the relevant factors or performance indicators and associated units of measurement.
  • Describe the application of an appropriate analysis tool to the problem.
  • Offer insights and evidence-based recommendations.

As you prepare for this webcam presentation, keep the imaginary audience in mind. It is comprised of a diverse senior leadership team at the selected organization. The team represents a variety of ages, cultures, and perspectives. You will communicate your presentation in a concise, professional, and culturally competent manner. The goal is to persuade the senior leadership team to implement the evidence-based recommendations presented. Consider that two senior leadership team members may be evaluating you as a high potential candidate for a promotion. Good luck! It is time to construct your presentation.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

• • Competency 3: Construct evidence-based health care management recommendations in compliance with personal and professional values and legal, regulatory, and ethical considerations.

• • • Analyze evidence-based recommendations with respect to organizational context.
    • Provide rationale for the execution of evidence-based recommendations.
  • Competency 5: Create comprehensive and useable data-driven action plans, based on industry benchmarks.

• • • Construct a data-driven action plan based upon industry benchmarks to solve the selected health care problem.
  • Competency 6: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.

• • • Create a succinct PowerPoint presentation on the selected problem and recommendations that is designed for interdepartmental senior leadership team viewing.

Preparation

Complete these tasks to successfully prepare for this presentation.

Slides

• • Review Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX] for a refresher on how to create compelling, visually appealing slides that capture the audience’s attention.
  • Download and study the Final PowerPoint Template [PPTX] for a suggested structure for the slides. Using the slide template will help to keep your presentation within the maximum 3 to 5 minute presentation time frame.

Practice Video Recording the Presentation

After developing slides and preparing your speaker notes, practice delivering the presentation multiple times via screen and webcam recording before making the final webcam recording for submission. Practicing your presentation multiple times will make the presentation more polished and professional.  Likewise, multiple dry runs will also help you adhere to the 3 to 5 minute maximum presentation length. Before submitting the presentation, make sure the recording is audible, the slides are visible, and that you are included in a video capture.

Consult the Using Kaltura [PDF] for additional guidance on how to record the presentation.

Instructions

Use the Final PowerPoint [PPTX] template to create a 3–5 minute recorded PowerPoint presentation of 8–12 preformatted slides. The template provides the outline of what you need to cover in the presentation. The goal of this assessment is to communicate essential elements of your analysis in a succinct manner. A 3- to 5-minute presentation may not seem long, but it is the reality in today’s health care workplace. Busy executives will not be able to spare more time than this. The presentation is for interdepartmental senior leadership team viewing.

Be sure to include visual summaries of your data, such as a pie chart or graph. The summarized data visual display should be in a readable format in a Word document or spreadsheet. It is important to include specific titles for the data summaries that identify the subject matter and measurement units.

BHA 4020 Interdisciplinary Presentation of Evidence Based Recommendations PPT

Additional Requirements

• • Communication: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, respectful, and consistent with expectations for professional practice in health care administration. Original work, critical thinking, and scholarly writing are required in the assessment.  Writing must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • Media presentation: Recommended number of slides is  8–12 slides. Presentation length is not to exceed 5 minutes. Include with the submission: the slides, the recording, speaker notes as a transcript, and your visual data summary.
  • Resources: Cite a minimum of three current, scholarly, and/or authoritative sources.  These resources need to be from the independent research you have conducted. They need to go beyond the suggested resources provided in the course. Also be sure to provide a separate slide for references at the end of your presentation.
  • APA: Follow APA formatting and style guidelines for citations and references. Consult this resource for an APA refresher: APA Style & Format.
  • Font and font size: Appropriate size and weight for presentation, generally 24–28 points for headings and no smaller than 18 points for bullet-point text.

Create and deliver a slide presentation (8-12 slides; 3-5 minutes maximum presentation) on the analysis of a selected health care problem

Health Care Problem Analysis Proposal

1. Introduction
2. The assessment of healthcare quality is essential for justifying the economic expenditure that the United States incurs to maintain its public health systems.
3. As a sector that utilizes an estimated 10 percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), the healthcare industry should contribute to the reduction of the disease burden in the country.
4. However, the high rate of avoidable errors during care delivery is creating mistrust among patients and increasing the burden of disease among the patient population in the United States.
5. Therefore, an analysis of the rate of occurrence of amenable mortality in the industry would is an effective measurement of the level of quality of healthcare services and improvement measures.
6. Problem Statement
7. The selected problem for this analysis proposal is amenable mortality during hospitalization.
8. Amenable mortality is the premature death that results from conditions that can be treated with either primary or secondary medical care (Vergara-Duarte et al., 2018).
9. Amenable mortality is a major healthcare problem for patients, providers, and other stakeholders because its causes are preventable or avoidable, it has greater adverse impacts on the life expectancy rate of the country, and contributes to higher healthcare expenditure.

• Assessment of Amenable Mortality in the U.S Health System

1. In their study, Vergara-Duarte et al. (2018) examined the potential limitations of treatments for the causes of amenable deaths in U.S hospitals and their impact on the quality of healthcare services.
2. It is a study that categorized the different causes of amenable deaths that can make it a sentinel event and the level of efficacy of the different interventions against these causes.
3. Hence, is useful for understanding the different aspects of the problem that makes a serious healthcare issue in the United States.
4. The study by Allin and Grignon (2014) found that amenable mortality is a valid and reliable indicator for measuring the effectiveness of healthcare systems.
5. It is the reason why leaders of healthcare organizations and policymakers are using the data on avoidable deaths to shape their patient safety policies.
6. Therefore, these findings from this article illustrate how the stastical values of this parameter, especially their reliability and sensitivity, are useful tools for determining the effectiveness of the health system or otherwise.
7. Kobewka, van Walraven, Taljaard, Ronksley, and Forster(2017) used their multisite retrospective cohort study to quantify the prevalence of preventable deaths using the latent class analysis of the physician reviews of 480 deaths at a teaching hospital.
8. The study outcome provides evidence of the effectiveness of the methods for classifying amenable deaths.
9. Thus, the identification of the prevalence of the problem in the healthcare system is necessary for developing the right measures for dealing with the problem.
10. Panagioti et al.(2018) performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the prevalence, causes, and severity of the adverse impacts of preventable harm to patients in different clinical settings.
11. The study found that there is an urgent need for targeted quality improvement initiatives by hospitals and policymakers to reduce the adverse impacts of preventable harm to patients in these clinical settings.
12. As a result, this article provided mitigation strategies for hospitals to address the high prevalence of amenable mortality in the United States.
13. Manaseki‐holland et al. (2019) studied the tools for ranking hospitals according to their rate of avoidable deaths to determine the complexity of the factors that contribute to the problem.
14. In this regard, this research study examined the potential areas of improvement in these tools, especially those that are used for the direct measurement of the level of the problem in the healthcare system.
15. Hence, the outcome of this study highlighted the need for standardized measurement tools for avoidable deaths to help healthcare organizations create effective quality and safety programs.
16. The quantitatve study by Rodwin et al. (2020) assessed the rate of inpatient deaths using the physician notes on the cause of death to illustrate the depth of the problem in the American health system.
17. The findings from this study identified medical errors and patients’ underlying disease conditions as the major causes of the problem.
18. Therefore, the outcome of this study is linked to the desire of hospitals and policymakers to use amenable mortality to determine the quality levels that can be used for reimbursements.
19. Benchmark for Amenable Mortality
20. The standardized mortality rate is the performance indicator that hospitals and regulators use to measure the quality of care services and identify the potential causes of the problem (Manaseki‐holland et al., 2019).
21. In this regard, Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) Index and Physician Case Note are the instruments for collecting this information during quality reporting for reimbursement.
22. The HAQ index is a scoring scale of 0-100 that uses its lower scores as an indicator of the high prevalence rate of amenable mortality at the macro level (Barber et al., 2017).
23. The Physician Case note is the institutional data collection tool for SMR and measures the number of deaths per 100,000 to determine the amenable mortality rate for the hospital.
24. Preliminary Action Plan Steps (steps for completing the project )
25. First, a preliminary library search of current healthcare problems in the United States was performed to select amenable mortality as the one for this analysis paper.
26. Second, a detailed library search for articles on the characteristics of the problem was performed to identify the current research into amenable mortality.
27. The next step was use to the outcome of the literature search and review to formulate the problem statement before moving to the review of the prevalence and causes of amenable mortality.
28. Finally, analysis of the measure of the rates of amenable mortality and ACHE competency model for the problem was conducted to complete this capstone project.
29. Review of ACHE Competency Model for Amenable Mortality

ACHE Domain	ACHE Competency Selected	How This Competency Relates to the Capstone Health Care Problem Analysis Proposal
Communication and Relationship Management	Communication skills	The communication skills competency is chosen because this capstone project requires me to articulate the findings of my research on amenable mortality and use the information to improve the knowledge levels on the problem.
Leadership	Organizational climate and culture	I chose organizational climate and culture because I need an understanding of the behavioral and clinical practices that contribute to the problem to complete this capstone project successfully. This competency is also required to manage the changes to the clinical practices that lead to avoidable deaths in the organization.
Professionalism	Contributions to the Community and Profession	I chose contributions to the community and profession because it would help to determine the ethical and professional standards that should guide the measures against amenable mortality and reduce the incidence of the problem in our healthcare system.
Knowledge of the Healthcare Environment	Healthcare Personnel	I chose healthcare personnel because this capstone project requires me to develop quality improvement strategies that involve the inclusion of the hospital’s workforce to achieve its objectives. As a result, I need to develop the competency to engage the different stakeholders positively during the implementation of the project’s activities.
Business Skills and Knowledge	Quality improvement	I chose quality improvement because the primary goal of this capstone project is to use its findings to create and implement quality improvement initiatives that reduces the prevalence of the problem and its associated costs in the health system.

 

 

 

 

 

 References

Allin, S., & Grignon, M. (2014). Examining the role of amenable mortality as an indicator of health system effectiveness. Healthcare Policy, 9(3), 12. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3999566/

Barber, R. M., Fullman, N., Sorensen, R. J., Bollyky, T., McKee, M., Nolte, E., … & Davey, G. (2017). Healthcare Access and Quality Index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a novel analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The lancet, 390(10091), 231-266. Retrieved from https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(17)30818-8.pdf

Kobewka, D. M., van Walraven, C., Taljaard, M., Ronksley, P., & Forster, A. J. (2017). The prevalence of potentially preventable deaths in an acute care hospital: A retrospective cohort. Medicine, 96(8). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006162

Manaseki‐holland, S., Lilford, R. J., Te, A. P., Chen, Y. F., Gupta, K. K., Chilton, P. J., & Hofer, T. P. (2019). Ranking hospitals based on preventable Hospital death rates: a systematic review with implications for both direct measurement and indirect measurement through standardized mortality rates. The Milbank Quarterly, 97(1), 228-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12375

Panagioti, M., Khan, K., Keers, R. N., Abuzour, A., Phipps, D., Kontopantelis, E., … & Ashcroft, D. M. (2019). Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4185

Rodwin, B. A., Bilan, V. P., Merchant, N. B., Steffens, C. G., Grimshaw, A. A., Bastian, L. A., & Gunderson, C. G. (2020). Rate of preventable mortality in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of general internal medicine, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05592-5

Vergara-Duarte, M., Borrell, C., Pérez, G., Martín-Sánchez, J. C., Clèries, R., Buxó, M., … & Benach, J. (2018). Sentinel amenable mortality: a new way to assess the quality of healthcare by examining causes of premature death for which highly efficacious medical interventions are available. BioMed research international, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5456074

BHA 4020 Interdisciplinary Presentation of Evidence Based Recommendations PPT

 

^{"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."}