Imagine you are on a district English learner (EL) committee tasked with creating materials for a session to provide teachers with background concerning laws or court decisions that have had a significant impact on the education of English learners.
Research the following court decisions and laws:
Court Decisions:
Lau v. Nichols (1974)
Castañeda v. Pickard (1981)
Plyler v. Doe (1982)
Flores v. Arizona (2000)
Federal Laws:
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Title III
Title VI
Arizona State Laws:
Arizona Proposition 203
Arizona House Bill 2010
Arizona House Bill 2064
Arizona Senate Bill 1014
Consider reviewing this week’s University Library resources for research purposes.
Select one court decision, one federal law, and one state law that you feel have had the greatest impact on English learner education.
Write an 875- to 1,050-word paper in which you:
Write an overview of the historical background of the court decision, federal law, and state law you selected.
Explain what impact the court decision you selected had on the policies and laws governing language instruction in Arizona.
Explain what impact the federal law you selected had on accountability, assessment, funding, and identification in EL education.
Explain what impact the Arizona state law you selected has on language acquisition methodology, student grouping, and the time frame to achieve language proficiency.
Refer to the rubric in the main course folder for assignment expectations.
To assist you effectively with this assignment, I’ll provide an outline and brief overview for each of the selected court decision, federal law, and state law that have impacted English learner education.
### Selected Court Decision: Lau v. Nichols (1974)
**Overview:**
Lau v. Nichols was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that addressed the educational rights of non-English speaking students under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case originated in San Francisco, where Chinese American students argued that they were not receiving equal educational opportunities due to the district’s lack of accommodations for their limited English proficiency.
**Impact on Arizona:**
– **Policies and Laws:** Lau v. Nichols established that denying English language learners access to meaningful education violates their civil rights. This decision prompted federal agencies and states, including Arizona, to develop policies ensuring equal access to education for English learners.
### Selected Federal Law: Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
**Overview:**
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015 replaced the No Child Left Behind Act and governs K-12 public education policy in the United States. ESSA includes provisions specifically addressing the needs of English learners, such as requirements for English proficiency assessments and accountability measures.
**Impact on Arizona:**
– **Accountability and Assessment:** ESSA mandates that English learners’ progress in English proficiency must be measured annually through valid and reliable assessments.
– **Funding:** ESSA provides federal funding through Title III specifically for English learners to support language instruction programs and services.
– **Identification:** ESSA requires states, including Arizona, to establish criteria and procedures for identifying English learners and monitoring their progress.
### Selected State Law: Arizona Proposition 203
**Overview:**
Arizona Proposition 203, passed in 2000, significantly impacted bilingual education in the state by mandating English-only instruction for English learners. It required that all public school instruction be conducted in English, with limited exceptions.
**Impact on Arizona:**
– **Language Acquisition Methodology:** Proposition 203 shifted Arizona’s approach from bilingual education to structured English immersion programs for English learners.
– **Student Grouping:** It mandated that English learners be placed in separate classrooms for intensive English language instruction for a specified period.
– **Time Frame for Proficiency:** The law set a time frame of one year for English learners to transition to mainstream English classrooms.
### Paper Structure Suggestions:
1. **Introduction:**
– Brief overview of the significance of court decisions and laws on English learner education.
– Introduction to Lau v. Nichols, ESSA, and Proposition 203 as the selected court decision, federal law, and state law, respectively.
2. **Historical Background:**
– Detailed historical context of Lau v. Nichols (1974), ESSA, and Proposition 203.
3. **Impact Analysis:**
– **Lau v. Nichols (1974):** Discuss its impact on Arizona’s language instruction policies and laws.
– **ESSA:** Analyze its effects on accountability, assessment, funding, and identification of English learners in Arizona.
– **Proposition 203:** Explain its influence on language acquisition methodologies, student grouping practices, and the time frame for achieving language proficiency in Arizona.
4. **Conclusion:**
– Summarize the overall impact of these court decisions and laws on English learner education in Arizona.
– Reflect on how these legal decisions and laws continue to shape educational practices and policies today.
Ensure to integrate scholarly references in current APA format to support your analysis and findings. This structure should help you effectively frame and organize your paper for EDUC 735.
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."
