For this Discussion, you identify a specific benchmark related to social change in the organization you have been studying/discussing in the previous weeks. You will consider evaluation strategies regarding the benchmark(s) you will set, the metrics you will use, and the frequency of measure to demonstrate the effectiveness in reaching your chosen benchmark(s) for your specific nonprofit or public/government organization.
Frequency measurement is a “measure of how many times something happens within a certain known period” (Wilmshurst, 2010, p. 283). The frequency of measure depends on what you are doing.
Consider the following scenario:
An emergency department has a certain required amount of triage time but does not want nonemergency patients waiting longer than 15 minutes before they are seen. Therefore, 15 minutes is the desired benchmark for the emergency department in this scenario. However, stakeholders are seeing it is taking 60 minutes to get patients into the emergency department. Given the staffing, a realistic benchmark may be to reduce the amount of time it takes to get a patient into the emergency department from 60 minutes to 30 minutes. To measure the gains, the frequency of measure would be to examine the admissions data each day for 30 days and the actual measures in that 30 days represent the outcomes of the processes put in place to reduce the patient waiting time.
Reference:
Wilmshurst, T. (2010). Designing embedded systems with PIC microcontrollers: Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Newnes.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
TO PREPARE
- Review the Benchmarks and Metrics Vignettes in the Learning Resources.
- Based on the organization you studied/discussed in the previous weeks, identify a specific outcome related to positive social change to support organizational success.
- Consider strategies regarding how to find and use benchmarks and develop metrics for a specific nonprofit or public/government organization.
BY DAY 3
Post benchmarks related to a specific outcome and develop metrics for monitoring outcome data for a nonprofit or public/government organization. Include your frequency of measure and/or how often you will measure, and explain why. State your opinion and validate with two peer-reviewed, scholarly resource(s).
(150 words)
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post Reply!
Be sure to support your posts with specific references to the Learning Resources and peer-reviewed sources from the Walden Library and/or the internet. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.
For this Discussion, you identify a specific benchmark related to social change in the organization you have been studying/discussing in the previous weeks
Organization: American Red Cross
Organization: American Red Cross
Positive Social Change Goal: Strengthening Community Resilience through Enhanced Disaster Preparedness and Response
The Red Cross of America concentrates on strong communities by working at the household level and trying to develop capacity for disaster preparedness. For the coming 12 months and thereafter, our objective is defined as achieving 25% more participants in the programs as the result of certain, measurable, and feasible activities. This will be ensured by following employee training completion as well as individual emergency plan creation step by step (Imperiale & Vanclay, 2020). This kind of delivery of services encourages community readiness, hence building a united community that is ready for sudden disasters.
Our envisioned strategy integrates vision from personalized community clinics to user-friendly mobile apps, together with partnerships, a redesigned training system, and impact assessment. Furthermore, it addresses the demands of community engagement, aligning the forces, which in turn promotes a more dynamic, secure, and stable environment worldwide (Tariq et al., 2021). Nevertheless, our aims might be as big as the sky, but ours will still be a joint effort that will be the footpath for permanent development. Therefore, by dedicating ourselves to resilience and preparing for the worst, we are determined to have a world where a strong community will stand.
References
Imperiale, A. J., & Vanclay, F. (2020). Barriers to enhancing disaster risk reduction and community resilience: Evidence from the L’Aquila disaster. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 232-243. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3179
Tariq, H., Pathirage, C., & Fernando, T. (2021). Measuring community disaster resilience at local levels: An adaptable resilience framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 62, 102358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102358
For the nonprofit organization I have been studying, which focuses on providing educational support to underprivileged children, a specific outcome related to positive social change could be improving literacy rates among the target population.
**Benchmark:** Increase the average reading proficiency level of students by one grade level within one academic year.
**Metrics:**
- Pre and Post-Assessment Scores: Administer standardized reading assessments at the beginning and end of the academic year to measure students’ reading proficiency levels.
- Attendance Rates: Monitor students’ attendance to ensure consistent participation in literacy programs, as regular attendance correlates with academic achievement.
- Participation in Enrichment Activities: Track students’ engagement in supplementary literacy activities, such as reading clubs, tutoring sessions, and literacy workshops.
**Frequency of Measure:**
– Pre and Post-Assessment Scores: Assessments will be conducted at the beginning and end of each academic year to measure progress over time.
– Attendance Rates: Attendance will be monitored weekly during literacy program sessions to identify trends and address any attendance-related issues promptly.
– Participation in Enrichment Activities: Participation will be tracked monthly to assess students’ involvement in supplementary literacy initiatives and identify areas for improvement.
**Rationale:**
– Regular assessment of students’ reading proficiency levels allows for ongoing monitoring of progress and the effectiveness of literacy interventions.
– Weekly monitoring of attendance ensures that students are consistently engaged in literacy programs, which is essential for achieving desired outcomes.
– Monthly tracking of participation in enrichment activities provides insights into students’ level of engagement and helps identify potential barriers to participation that may need to be addressed.
References:
- Lee, J., & Bowen, N. K. (2006). Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 193–218.
- Ross, C. E., & Wu, C. L. (1995). The links between education and health. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 719–745.
For this Discussion, you identify a specific benchmark related to social change in the organization you have been studying/discussing in the previous weeks
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."
